New Delhi, January 27, 2025
The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) has approved the Waqf Amendment Bill with 14 key modifications to the draft initially tabled in Parliament last August. The bill aims to introduce sweeping reforms to the administration of Waqf boards across India. However, the process has been fraught with opposition, controversy, and allegations of bias, leaving the final report shrouded in tension.
Opposition Outcry Over Rejected Amendments
Led by BJP MP Jagadambika Pal, the JPC rejected all 44 amendments proposed by opposition members, many of which were aimed at addressing concerns about the bill’s impact on religious freedoms and the functioning of Waqf institutions. Opposition MPs accused the committee chair of rushing the bill without adequate deliberation, citing bias and political motives.
Originally, the JPC was expected to present its report by November 29, 2024. However, repeated delays extended the deadline to February 13, the final day of the Budget Session. The tensions reached a boiling point last week when 10 opposition MPs were suspended from the committee, further fueling allegations of an authoritarian approach.
In a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, opposition MPs alleged that the bill was being “steamrolled” with the Delhi Assembly elections on February 5 in mind, calling it a politically motivated move to consolidate votes.
Key Provisions of the Waqf Amendment Bill
The Waqf Amendment Bill introduces significant changes to the governance of Waqf boards. Among the most notable provisions:
- Inclusion of Non-Muslim Members: The bill allows the nomination of non-Muslim members and at least two women members to Waqf boards.
- Revised Central Waqf Council Composition: The council will now include a Union Minister, three Members of Parliament, two ex-judges, four individuals of national repute, and senior government officials who are not required to be from the Islamic faith.
- Restrictions on Donations: A controversial clause restricts donations from Muslims practicing their faith for less than five years, sparking concerns over the criteria for defining a “practicing Muslim.”
Critics argue that these provisions risk undermining religious freedoms, with Congress leader KC Venugopal describing them as a “direct attack on the autonomy of Waqf institutions.”
Empowerment or Interference?
The government claims the amendments aim to empower marginalized Muslim women and children and increase transparency in the management of Waqf properties. Supporters assert that these reforms will make the system more inclusive and accountable, particularly by involving women in decision-making roles.
However, opposition members argue that the changes could interfere with religious and cultural practices. They fear the inclusion of non-Muslim members and government officials could dilute the Islamic character of Waqf boards and open the door to political interference.
What Lies Ahead?
With the JPC’s final report due on February 13, the bill is poised to be a major flashpoint in Parliament. The BJP-led government has indicated its intent to push the bill forward despite mounting opposition, arguing that it is necessary for reforming outdated laws.
As the nation awaits the next steps, the Waqf Amendment Bill has become a litmus test for the government’s ability to balance religious empowerment with political considerations, amid claims of electoral motivations and concerns over religious rights.
The debate over the bill’s provisions and the controversies surrounding its approval underscore the deep divides in Indian politics over matters of religion, governance, and representation.
